Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
- MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 78/100 | 100/100 | 33/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | 47/100 | 100/100 | 61/100 | 93/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.32/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Output
$3.96/ 1M
$0.94/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
26
88K
Completed sessions
422
418,273
Token share
0%
0.17%
Tokens
72M+100%
1.7T+100%
AUG 20OCT 14
AUG 20OCT 14
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
64.1%2.7K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.6-Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Jamba LargeMiMo-V2.6-Pro·Jamba Large