Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Nano Banana 2.1
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
- Nano Banana 2.1GoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 78/100 | 100/100 | 36/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
| Nano Banana 2.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 28/100 | 33/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
131K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text, Image
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.32/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Output
$3.96/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
26
No usage
Completed sessions
422
No usage
Token share
0%
No usage
Tokens
72M+100%
No usage
AUG 14OCT 8
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNano Banana 2.1 vs Jamba MiniNano Banana 2.1·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNano Banana 2.1 vs Jamba LargeNano Banana 2.1·Jamba Large