CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5 NanoOpenAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 100/100 | 74/100 | 60/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | No data |
| GPT-5 Nano | 100/100 | No data | 82/100 | 71/100 | 33/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.44/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$1.32/ 1M
$0.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4.2M
11K
Completed sessions
27,313,543
59,512
Token share
53%
0%
Tokens
289T+114%
4.1B-94%
JUL 17SEP 10
JUL 17SEP 10
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.1%455K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeGPT-5 Nano vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGPT-5 Nano·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902DeepSeek V4 Flash·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonGPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GPT-5 Nano·Qwen3.8 Max 0902