Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.1 Codex mini
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5.1 Codex miniOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 25/100 | 75/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| GPT-5.1 Codex mini | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 54/100 | 71/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.2M
0
Completed sessions
36,971,875
3
Token share
15.9%
0%
Tokens
154T-31%
00%
AUG 17OCT 11
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.5%418K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeGPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.1 Codex mini·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonGPT-5.1 Codex mini vs Jamba LargeGPT-5.1 Codex mini·Jamba Large