GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

  1. DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash25/10075/10059/10082/1000/1000/100
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder100/10093/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.8M
No usage
Completed sessions
32,825,445
No usage
Token share
13%
No usage
Tokens
130T-47%
No usage
AUG 20OCT 14
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.3%272K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.