CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNvidiaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 75/100 | 63/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B | 0/100 | 37/100 | 87/100 | 61/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.27/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$1.08/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0054/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4.4M
260K
Completed sessions
38,167,084
4,725,981
Token share
37.2%
0.5%
Tokens
301T+162%
4T+100%
AUG 2SEP 26
AUG 2SEP 26
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.6%486K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba LargeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B·Jamba Large