Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 Code

DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash	26/100	73/100	84/100	81/100	0/100	0/100
Kimi K2.7 Code	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	34/100	63/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

DeepSeek

Moonshot

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

DeepSeek

Moonshot

Pricing

Input

$0.09/ 1M

$0.60/ 1M

Output

$0.18/ 1M

$3.50/ 1M

Cached input

$0.02/ 1M

$0.15/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

1.5M

156K

Completed sessions

21,933,670

585,545

Token share

5.76%

0.11%

Tokens

71T-75%

1.3T-42%

SEP 6OCT 31

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

63.1%139K user-weeks

57.2%14K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.7 CodeDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 FlashJamba Mini Related comparisonKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 CodeJamba Mini