Try OpenCodeTry OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs kimi-k3.1-pro-siliconflow-test

  1. DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
  2. kimi-k3.1-pro-siliconflow-testMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash26/10074/10056/10080/1000/1000/100
kimi-k3.1-pro-siliconflow-test50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$1.20/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
674K
1
Completed sessions
8,875,892
1
Token share
1.95%
0%
Tokens
28T-91%
170K+100%
SEP 21NOV 15
SEP 21NOV 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.9%59K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.