Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs oc/minimax-m3.1-flash
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- oc/minimax-m3.1-flashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 25/100 | 73/100 | 79/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| oc/minimax-m3.1-flash | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.13/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$0.26/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
708K
1
Completed sessions
9,667,343
2
Token share
2.11%
0%
Tokens
31T-90%
6M+100%
SEP 20NOV 14
SEP 20NOV 14
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.9%59K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeoc/minimax-m3.1-flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructoc/minimax-m3.1-flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonoc/minimax-m3.1-flash vs Jamba Minioc/minimax-m3.1-flash·Jamba Mini