Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-PreviewMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 75/100 | 60/100 | 80/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 100/100 | 80/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.8M
No usage
Completed sessions
36,035,038
No usage
Token share
22.8%
No usage
Tokens
218T+30%
No usage
AUG 13OCT 7
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
62.5%418K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash-Preview·Jamba Large