Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.5
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.5MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 76/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 51/100 | 56/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.14/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.28/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
24K
Completed sessions
19,594,092
83,563
Token share
4.78%
0%
Tokens
61T-79%
9.7B-68%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.3%88K user-weeks
64.9%134 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.5·Jamba Mini