Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.1
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.1MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 57/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| MiniMax-M2.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 41/100 | 55/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$1.22/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.1M
0
Completed sessions
28,556,473
15
Token share
8.84%
0%
Tokens
100T-62%
00%
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67.2%194K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.1·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.1 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.1·Jamba Mini