CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Ling 3.0 Flash FinInclusionai
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 100/100 | 74/100 | 72/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | No data |
| Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | 100/100 | No data | 89/100 | 62/100 | 0/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4.3M
No usage
Completed sessions
31,748,876
No usage
Token share
48%
No usage
Tokens
295T+130%
No usage
JUL 22SEP 15
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.3%483K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITLing 3.0 Flash Fin·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902DeepSeek V4 Flash·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Ling 3.0 Flash Fin·Qwen3.8 Max 0902