Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 50/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.75/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$3.75/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
3
Completed sessions
19,594,092
19
Token share
4.77%
0%
Tokens
61T-79%
200K+100%
SEP 9NOV 3
SEP 9NOV 3
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.3%88K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGemini 3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGemini 3.8 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGemini 3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniGemini 3.8 Flash·Jamba Mini