Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Kimi K2.7 Code

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp	25/100	75/100	69/100	81/100	33/100	0/100
Kimi K2.7 Code	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	35/100	63/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

DeepSeek

Moonshot

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

DeepSeek

Moonshot

Pricing

Input

$0.15/ 1M

$0.95/ 1M

Output

$0.60/ 1M

$4.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.003/ 1M

$0.19/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

321K

161K

Completed sessions

1,193,896

504,434

Token share

0.76%

0.12%

Tokens

8.1T+406%

1.2T-54%

AUG 26OCT 20

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

62.9%26K user-weeks

59.7%14K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpJamba Mini Nearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 CodeJamba Mini Related comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpJamba Large Related comparisonKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba LargeKimi K2.7 CodeJamba Large