Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-5.3Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 64/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GLM-5.3 | 85/100 | 100/100 | 30/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.17/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Output
$0.70/ 1M
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.005/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.5M
273K
Completed sessions
92,981,913
833,341
Token share
34.3%
0.1%
Tokens
396T+100%
1.2T+39%
AUG 31OCT 25
AUG 31OCT 25
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
47.9%20K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3·Jamba Mini