Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 78/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 17/100 | 53/100 | 47/100 | 93/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.07/ 1M
$0.40/ 1M
Output
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0015/ 1M
$0.08/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.5M
1.1M
Completed sessions
92,283,784
46,421,169
Token share
34.2%
2.77%
Tokens
393T+100%
32T-6%
AUG 31OCT 25
AUG 31OCT 25
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
70.6%23K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5·Jamba Mini