Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs test-deepinfra
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- test-deepinfraHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| test-deepinfra | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text, Image
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$1.20/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.3M
4
Completed sessions
84,804,032
6
Token share
32.3%
0%
Tokens
366T+100%
283K+254%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativetest-deepinfra vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructtest-deepinfra·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisontest-deepinfra vs Jamba Minitest-deepinfra·Jamba Mini