Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 67/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 32/100 | 96/100 | 58/100 | 53/100 | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$1.21/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.3M
No usage
Completed sessions
144,642,337
No usage
Token share
48.1%
No usage
Tokens
640T+21,070%
No usage
SEP 11NOV 5
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.8%522K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeStep 3.7 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 3.7 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonStep 3.7 Flash vs Jamba MiniStep 3.7 Flash·Jamba Mini