Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 84/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-6.1 Terra | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 27/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Output
$0.19/ 1M
$5.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.000954/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.7M
No usage
Completed sessions
98,635,641
No usage
Token share
35.9%
No usage
Tokens
423T+100%
No usage
SEP 1OCT 26
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-6.1 Terra·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Jamba MiniGPT-6.1 Terra·Jamba Mini