CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | No data | 63/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | No data |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | 58/100 | 85/100 | 16/100 | 98/100 | 50/100 | 85/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$12/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
281K
0
Completed sessions
4,594,968
22
Token share
5.42%
0%
Tokens
34T+100%
00%
JUL 23SEP 16
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeGPT-5.6 Terra vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGPT-5.6 Terra·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902DeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonGPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902GPT-5.6 Terra·Qwen3.8 Max 0902