GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10059/10081/10033/10092/100
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder100/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.5M
No usage
Completed sessions
53,731,439
No usage
Token share
25.8%
No usage
Tokens
265T+100%
No usage
AUG 24OCT 18
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64.2%249K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.