GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10058/10082/10033/10092/100
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder93/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$1.20/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.9M
No usage
Completed sessions
71,279,489
No usage
Token share
29.7%
No usage
Tokens
316T+100%
No usage
AUG 27OCT 21
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.5%317K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.