Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 57/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.3M
43
Completed sessions
87,130,499
62
Token share
32.5%
0%
Tokens
373T+100%
17M+100%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba Mini