CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | No data | 81/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | No data |
| MiniMax-M2.7 | 100/100 | 77/100 | 64/100 | 48/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.16/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.31/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
92K
Completed sessions
No usage
157,938
Token share
No usage
0.06%
Tokens
No usage
307B-52%
No trend data
JUL 17SEP 10
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
68.2%3.3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITMiniMax-M2.7·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902DeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902MiniMax-M2.7·Qwen3.8 Max 0902