GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10077/10081/10033/10092/100
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct0/100 — Reasoning not supported13/10061/10081/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.07/ 1M
$0.27/ 1M
Output
$0.30/ 1M
$0.85/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0015/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.5M
No usage
Completed sessions
92,676,163
No usage
Token share
34.3%
No usage
Tokens
395T+100%
No usage
AUG 31OCT 25
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.