Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 78/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 82/100 | 63/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.07/ 1M
$0.07/ 1M
Output
$0.30/ 1M
$0.22/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0015/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.5M
128K
Completed sessions
92,486,292
3,623,651
Token share
34.2%
0.2%
Tokens
394T+100%
2.3T+1,588%
AUG 31OCT 25
AUG 31OCT 25
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLing 3.0 Flash Fin·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Jamba MiniLing 3.0 Flash Fin·Jamba Mini