GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.5

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101756/100100/10059/10081/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.517/10053/10076/10092/10067/10050/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.16/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
1.4M
Completed sessions
No usage
55,683,910
Token share
No usage
4.27%
Tokens
No usage
44T+94%
No trend data
AUG 24OCT 18
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
72.1%26K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.