Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs iceman

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
icemanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	68/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
iceman	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder

Overview

Author

Context length

Unknown

Reasoning

True

Unknown

Input modalities

Text, Image

Unknown

Output modalities

Text

Unknown

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$0.60/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.003/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

52K

25K

Completed sessions

771,978

280,058

Token share

0.18%

0.07%

Tokens

2.1T+100%

841B+100%

SEP 1OCT 26

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.