Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | 56/100 | 100/100 | 59/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 83/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.002/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
1.5M
Completed sessions
No usage
370,098,235
Token share
No usage
22.6%
Tokens
No usage
231T+100%
No trend data
AUG 24OCT 18
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
67%41K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba Large