GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs GLM-5.2

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. GLM-5.2Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
GLM-5.2100/100100/10030/10081/1000/10088/100
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$1.20/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
442
151K
Completed sessions
3,895
659,043
Token share
0%
0.06%
Tokens
22B+100%
686B-87%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
52.3%13K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.