GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs GLM-5.1

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
GLM-5.150/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark88/10034/10046/1000/10045/100
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
200K
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.90/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$3.59/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.19/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
234
39K
Completed sessions
1,645
102,471
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
6.9B+100%
57B-80%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
51.1%1.4K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.