GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs Kimi K3

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Kimi K3100/100100/10010/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$3.00/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$15/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
442
234K
Completed sessions
3,895
766,250
Token share
0%
0.05%
Tokens
22B+100%
537B-70%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
40.4%18K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.