GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

  1. deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flashDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder17/10093/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$2.00/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$10/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5
1.1K
Completed sessions
90
2,685
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
64K+100%
4.7B+100%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.