GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: qiniu/conatus vs Grok 4.6

  1. qiniu/conatusHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Grok 4.6xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
qiniu/conatus50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Grok 4.650/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark39/10025/10075/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
500K
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$2.00/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1
51K
Completed sessions
1
120,044
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
2M+100%
54B+114%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
38.6%3K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.