Compare AI models: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
- Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 91/100 | 0/100 | 18/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 100/100 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 25/100 | 73/100 | 59/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
2.5M
Completed sessions
No usage
30,046,354
Token share
No usage
11.6%
Tokens
No usage
118T-54%
No trend data
AUG 23OCT 17
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
69.3%272K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Sonnet 5.5·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Jamba LargeClaude Sonnet 5.5·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba Large