Compare AI models: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 28/100 | 71/100 | 10/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 22/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 68/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$3.00/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$15/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1
2
Completed sessions
26
8
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
3.1M+100%
5.7K+100%
AUG 25OCT 19
AUG 25OCT 19
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Jamba MiniClaude Sonnet 4.6·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Jamba LargeClaude Sonnet 4.6·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Large