Compare AI models: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
- MiniMax-M2.5MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 28/100 | 71/100 | 10/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 22/100 |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 51/100 | 59/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$3.00/ 1M
$0.27/ 1M
Output
$15/ 1M
$1.08/ 1M
Cached input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1
27K
Completed sessions
26
77,754
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
3.1M+100%
15B-53%
AUG 28OCT 22
AUG 28OCT 22
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
68.5%219 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Sonnet 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Jamba MiniClaude Sonnet 4.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.5·Jamba Mini