GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  1. Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Claude Opus 5.5100/10075/1009/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.6-Flash33/10060/10076/10092/10067/10055/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$4.00/ 1M
$0.16/ 1M
Output
$20/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
725K
Completed sessions
No usage
28,054,148
Token share
No usage
3.76%
Tokens
No usage
38T+100%
No trend data
AUG 23OCT 17
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
80.3%2.8K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.