Compare AI models: Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.5
- Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 100/100 | 75/100 | 9/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 17/100 | 53/100 | 76/100 | 92/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$4.00/ 1M
$0.16/ 1M
Output
$20/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
1.5M
Completed sessions
No usage
56,412,435
Token share
No usage
4.41%
Tokens
No usage
45T+109%
No trend data
AUG 23OCT 17
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
72.1%26K user-weeks