Compare AI models: Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 100/100 | 75/100 | 9/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 78/100 | 100/100 | 33/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$4.00/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Output
$20/ 1M
$3.96/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
26
Completed sessions
No usage
422
Token share
No usage
0%
Tokens
No usage
72M+100%
No trend data
AUG 21OCT 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Opus 5.5·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Opus 5.5 vs Jamba LargeClaude Opus 5.5·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba Large