Compare AI models: Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 100/100 | 75/100 | 9/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 34/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$4.00/ 1M
$1.74/ 1M
Output
$20/ 1M
$3.48/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
575K
Completed sessions
No usage
1,383,232
Token share
No usage
0.7%
Tokens
No usage
7T-80%
No trend data
AUG 21OCT 15
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
60.7%56K user-weeks