Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 69/100 | 25/100 | 72/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | 50/100 | 88/100 | 61/100 | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
91K
127K
Completed sessions
1,050,354
3,127,904
Token share
0.06%
0.58%
Tokens
744B+100%
6.6T+100%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.2%1.1K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Jamba Mini