Compare AI models: Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)
- Claude Fable 5.2AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.2 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 3/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 29/100 | 10/100 | 46/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$8.00/ 1M
$3.17/ 1M
Output
$40/ 1M
$16/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
0
Completed sessions
No usage
14
Token share
No usage
0%
Tokens
No usage
00%
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Fable 5.2 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Fable 5.2·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeClaude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Jamba MiniClaude Fable 5.2·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Sonnet 4.5 (latest) vs Jamba MiniClaude Sonnet 4.5 (latest)·Jamba Mini