CompareAI models
- Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 100/100 | No data | 4/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | No data |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 87/100 | 36/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 44/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$10/ 1M
$1.32/ 1M
Output
$50/ 1M
$3.96/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
1.4M
Completed sessions
No usage
2,519,247
Token share
No usage
4.88%
Tokens
No usage
27T+1%
No trend data
JUL 17SEP 10
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
63.9%128K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITClaude Fable 5.1·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Pro·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5.1·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902DeepSeek V4 Pro·Qwen3.8 Max 0902