CompareAI models
- Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
- Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 100/100 | No data | 4/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | No data |
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 100/100 | 35/100 | 8/100 | 43/100 | 50/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$10/ 1M
$5.00/ 1M
Output
$50/ 1M
$25/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITClaude Fable 5.1·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeClaude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITClaude Opus 4.5·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1·Qwen3.8 Flash NextRelated comparisonClaude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 4.5·Qwen3.8 Flash Next