Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902AlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 25/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 25/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.25/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
120K
No usage
Completed sessions
525,690
No usage
Token share
0.02%
No usage
Tokens
267B+24%
No usage
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
45.9%6.2K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max 0902·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max 0902·Jamba Mini