Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Hy3
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902AlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy3Tencent
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 24/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Hy3 | 67/100 | 68/100 | 71/100 | 54/100 | 0/100 | 40/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.13/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.53/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
104K
Completed sessions
No usage
1,333,843
Token share
No usage
0.1%
Tokens
No usage
1.1T-81%
No trend data
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
70.1%2.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max 0902·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max 0902·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3·Jamba Mini