Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902AlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFunHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 26/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 92/100 | 76/100 | 53/100 | 0/100 | 90/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.31/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max 0902·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max 0902·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Jamba MiniStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Jamba Mini