Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs MiniMax-M2.7

Qwen3.8 Max 0902AlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Qwen3.8 Max 0902	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	26/100	82/100	67/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiniMax-M2.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	76/100	55/100	50/100	0/100	0/100

Overview

Author

Alibaba

MiniMax

Context length

205K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video, Pdf

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Alibaba

MiniMax

Pricing

Input

$2.00/ 1M

$0.30/ 1M

Output

$6.00/ 1M

$1.20/ 1M

Cached input

$0.25/ 1M

$0.06/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

No usage

45K

Completed sessions

No usage

159,121

Token share

No usage

0.01%

Tokens

No usage

161B-55%

No trend data

AUG 28OCT 22

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

64.9%2K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max 0902Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max 0902Jamba Mini Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Mini